↓ Skip to main content

Oxygen therapy for acute myocardial infarction

Overview of attention for article published in this source, August 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

blogs
3 blogs
twitter
28 X users
facebook
4 Facebook pages
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
65 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
160 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Oxygen therapy for acute myocardial infarction
Published by
John Wiley & Sons, Ltd, August 2013
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd007160.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Cabello, Juan B, Burls, Amanda, Emparanza, José I, Bayliss, Susan, Quinn, Tom

Abstract

Oxygen (O₂) is widely used in people with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) although it has been suggested it may do more harm than good. Previous systematic reviews have concluded that there was insufficient evidence to know whether oxygen reduced, increased or had no effect on heart ischaemia or infarct size, as did our original Cochrane review on this topic in 2010. The wide dissemination of the lack of evidence to support this widely-used intervention since 2010 may stimulate the needed trials of oxygen therapy, and it is therefore important that this review is updated regularly.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 28 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 160 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 1%
Australia 1 <1%
Austria 1 <1%
Egypt 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 154 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 19 12%
Researcher 15 9%
Student > Bachelor 15 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 8%
Student > Postgraduate 10 6%
Other 28 18%
Unknown 60 38%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 62 39%
Nursing and Health Professions 15 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 3%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 4 3%
Psychology 2 1%
Other 7 4%
Unknown 65 41%