↓ Skip to main content

Effectiveness of vocational rehabilitation intervention on the return to work and employment of persons with multiple sclerosis

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2009
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
92 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
320 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Effectiveness of vocational rehabilitation intervention on the return to work and employment of persons with multiple sclerosis
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2009
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd007256.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Fary Khan, Louisa Ng, Lynne Turner‐Stokes

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 320 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 3 <1%
Germany 2 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Unknown 313 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 46 14%
Researcher 40 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 35 11%
Student > Bachelor 30 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 17 5%
Other 56 18%
Unknown 96 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 71 22%
Nursing and Health Professions 32 10%
Social Sciences 28 9%
Psychology 28 9%
Neuroscience 9 3%
Other 49 15%
Unknown 103 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 August 2019.
All research outputs
#8,571,053
of 25,457,297 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#9,070
of 11,499 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#53,553
of 184,852 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#44
of 83 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,457,297 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,499 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 40.0. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 184,852 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 83 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.