↓ Skip to main content

Interventions for managing temporomandibular joint osteoarthritis

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (68th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
26 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
145 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
500 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Interventions for managing temporomandibular joint osteoarthritis
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2012
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd007261.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Raphael F de Souza, Claudia H Lovato da Silva, Mona Nasser, Zbys Fedorowicz, Mohammed A Al‐Muharraqi

Abstract

Osteoarthritis (OA) is the most common form of arthritis of the temporomandibular joint (TMJ), and can often lead to severe pain in the orofacial region. Management options for TMJ OA include reassurance, occlusal appliances, physical therapy, medication in addition to several surgical modalities.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 26 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 500 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Australia 2 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 497 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 79 16%
Student > Bachelor 50 10%
Researcher 38 8%
Student > Postgraduate 37 7%
Student > Ph. D. Student 36 7%
Other 109 22%
Unknown 151 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 202 40%
Nursing and Health Professions 40 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 17 3%
Psychology 10 2%
Business, Management and Accounting 8 2%
Other 54 11%
Unknown 169 34%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 July 2018.
All research outputs
#2,119,946
of 25,457,297 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#4,420
of 11,499 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,230
of 174,458 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#54
of 174 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,457,297 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,499 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 40.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 174,458 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 174 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.