↓ Skip to main content

Sedative techniques for endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
84 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
156 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Sedative techniques for endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2012
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd007274.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Davinder Garewal, Steve Powell, Stephen J Milan, Jonas Nordmeyer, Pallavi Waikar

Abstract

Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) is an uncomfortable therapeutic procedure that cannot be performed without adequate sedation or general anaesthesia. A considerable number of ERCPs are performed annually in the UK (at least 48,000) and many more worldwide.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 156 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
India 1 <1%
Norway 1 <1%
Unknown 154 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 18 12%
Student > Master 16 10%
Researcher 15 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 5%
Other 29 19%
Unknown 55 35%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 67 43%
Nursing and Health Professions 13 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 1%
Computer Science 2 1%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 1%
Other 12 8%
Unknown 58 37%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 January 2021.
All research outputs
#16,106,935
of 25,457,858 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#10,216
of 11,842 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#110,767
of 181,239 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#143
of 182 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,457,858 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,842 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 38.9. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 181,239 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 182 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.