↓ Skip to main content

Home versus inpatient induction of labour for improving birth outcomes

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, August 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (88th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (60th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
20 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
21 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
226 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Home versus inpatient induction of labour for improving birth outcomes
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, August 2020
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd007372.pub4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Zarko Alfirevic, Gillian Ml Gyte, Vicky Nogueira Pileggi, Rachel Plachcinski, Alfred O Osoti, Elaine M Finucane

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 20 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 226 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 225 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 27 12%
Student > Bachelor 19 8%
Researcher 15 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 12 5%
Other 10 4%
Other 38 17%
Unknown 105 46%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 60 27%
Nursing and Health Professions 30 13%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 2%
Psychology 4 2%
Social Sciences 3 1%
Other 13 6%
Unknown 111 49%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 21. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 October 2022.
All research outputs
#1,775,051
of 25,595,500 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3,805
of 13,156 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#47,782
of 425,711 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#69
of 174 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,595,500 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,156 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 425,711 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 174 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.