↓ Skip to main content

Surgical versus conservative interventions for treating acromioclavicular dislocation of the shoulder in adults

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, August 2010
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
95 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
159 Mendeley
connotea
1 Connotea
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Surgical versus conservative interventions for treating acromioclavicular dislocation of the shoulder in adults
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, August 2010
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd007429.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Marcel Jun S Tamaoki, João Carlos Belloti, Mário Lenza, Marcelo Hide Matsumoto, Joao Baptista Gomes dos Santos, Flávio Faloppa

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 159 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Netherlands 1 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Unknown 154 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 45 28%
Student > Bachelor 21 13%
Other 15 9%
Researcher 14 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 6%
Other 25 16%
Unknown 29 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 76 48%
Nursing and Health Professions 23 14%
Psychology 7 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 3%
Social Sciences 5 3%
Other 10 6%
Unknown 33 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 July 2017.
All research outputs
#20,723,696
of 25,457,858 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#10,914
of 11,499 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#94,095
of 104,265 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#71
of 74 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,457,858 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,499 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 40.0. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 104,265 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 4th percentile – i.e., 4% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 74 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.