You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Skin preparation for preventing infection following caesarean section
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd007462.pub5 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Diah R Hadiati, Mohammad Hakimi, Detty S Nurdiati, Yuko Masuzawa, Katharina da Silva Lopes, Erika Ota |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 18 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 4 | 22% |
| United States | 2 | 11% |
| India | 1 | 6% |
| Korea, Republic of | 1 | 6% |
| Uruguay | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 9 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 13 | 72% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 17% |
| Scientists | 2 | 11% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 319 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 318 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 36 | 11% |
| Researcher | 33 | 10% |
| Other | 29 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 25 | 8% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 15 | 5% |
| Other | 48 | 15% |
| Unknown | 133 | 42% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 82 | 26% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 41 | 13% |
| Social Sciences | 7 | 2% |
| Unspecified | 6 | 2% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 5 | 2% |
| Other | 33 | 10% |
| Unknown | 145 | 45% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 25. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 June 2021.
All research outputs
#1,558,012
of 25,726,194 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3,309
of 13,135 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#44,218
of 436,036 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#54
of 185 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,726,194 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,135 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 436,036 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 185 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.