↓ Skip to main content

Non‐invasive ventilation during exercise training for people with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, May 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (63rd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
policy
1 policy source
twitter
11 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages
wikipedia
4 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
73 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
267 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Non‐invasive ventilation during exercise training for people with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, May 2014
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd007714.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Collette Menadue, Amanda J Piper, Alex J van 't Hul, Keith K Wong

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 267 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Netherlands 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 264 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 52 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 30 11%
Researcher 24 9%
Student > Bachelor 21 8%
Other 20 7%
Other 39 15%
Unknown 81 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 93 35%
Nursing and Health Professions 30 11%
Social Sciences 9 3%
Psychology 9 3%
Sports and Recreations 7 3%
Other 27 10%
Unknown 92 34%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 21. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 February 2022.
All research outputs
#1,800,120
of 25,457,297 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3,846
of 11,499 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#17,637
of 241,959 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#80
of 220 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,457,297 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,499 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 40.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 241,959 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 220 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.