↓ Skip to main content

Spectacle correction versus no spectacles for prevention of strabismus in hyperopic children

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (84th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
policy
1 policy source
twitter
1 X user
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
4 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
119 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Spectacle correction versus no spectacles for prevention of strabismus in hyperopic children
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2020
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd007738.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lisa Jones-Jordan, Xue Wang, Roberta W Scherer, Donald O Mutti

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 119 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Egypt 1 <1%
Unknown 118 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 17 14%
Student > Bachelor 14 12%
Researcher 7 6%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 5%
Other 15 13%
Unknown 53 45%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 25 21%
Nursing and Health Professions 10 8%
Psychology 4 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 3%
Social Sciences 3 3%
Other 16 13%
Unknown 58 49%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 February 2023.
All research outputs
#2,579,755
of 25,462,162 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#5,191
of 12,090 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#63,172
of 397,548 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#83
of 151 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,462,162 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,090 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 38.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 397,548 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 151 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.