You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Laparoscopic versus open surgical techniques for ventral or incisional hernia repair
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd007781.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Stefan Sauerland, Maren Walgenbach, Brigitte Habermalz, Christoph M Seiler, Marc Miserez |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 312 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Colombia | 1 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Turkey | 1 | <1% |
| Ecuador | 1 | <1% |
| India | 1 | <1% |
| Singapore | 1 | <1% |
| Belgium | 1 | <1% |
| Thailand | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 303 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 38 | 12% |
| Student > Master | 37 | 12% |
| Other | 31 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 31 | 10% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 27 | 9% |
| Other | 73 | 23% |
| Unknown | 75 | 24% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 177 | 57% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 8 | 3% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 7 | 2% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 6 | 2% |
| Engineering | 6 | 2% |
| Other | 16 | 5% |
| Unknown | 92 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 March 2016.
All research outputs
#23,196,437
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#12,811
of 13,149 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#113,850
of 120,865 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#96
of 99 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,149 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.8. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 120,865 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 99 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.