↓ Skip to main content

Exercises for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, August 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (72nd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
9 X users
facebook
5 Facebook pages
wikipedia
4 Wikipedia pages
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
118 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
352 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Exercises for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, August 2012
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd007837.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Michele Romano, Silvia Minozzi, Josette Bettany-Saltikov, Fabio Zaina, Nachiappan Chockalingam, Tomasz Kotwicki, Axel Maier-Hennes, Stefano Negrini

Abstract

Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) is a three-dimensional deformity of the spine . While AIS can progress during growth and cause a surface deformity, it is usually not symptomatic. However, in adulthood, if the final spinal curvature surpasses a certain critical threshold, the risk of health problems and curve progression is increased. The use of scoliosis-specific exercises (SSE) to reduce progression of AIS and postpone or avoid other more invasive treatments is controversial.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 352 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 3 <1%
Brazil 2 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Luxembourg 1 <1%
Unknown 344 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 52 15%
Student > Master 49 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 28 8%
Student > Postgraduate 23 7%
Researcher 19 5%
Other 58 16%
Unknown 123 35%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 86 24%
Nursing and Health Professions 54 15%
Psychology 18 5%
Sports and Recreations 12 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 3%
Other 30 9%
Unknown 143 41%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 21. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 December 2022.
All research outputs
#1,801,954
of 25,756,911 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3,813
of 13,137 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,952
of 186,749 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#58
of 213 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,756,911 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,137 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 186,749 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 213 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.