↓ Skip to main content

Biologics for rheumatoid arthritis: an overview of Cochrane reviews

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (77th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
policy
1 policy source
facebook
2 Facebook pages
wikipedia
10 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
224 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
264 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Biologics for rheumatoid arthritis: an overview of Cochrane reviews
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2009
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd007848.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jasvinder A Singh, Robin Christensen, George A Wells, Maria E Suarez‐Almazor, Rachelle Buchbinder, Maria Angeles Lopez‐Olivo, Elizabeth Tanjong Ghogomu, Peter Tugwell

Abstract

The biologic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs) are very effective in treating rheumatoid arthritis (RA), however there is a lack of head-to-head comparison studies.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 264 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Portugal 1 <1%
Colombia 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Finland 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Sri Lanka 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
China 1 <1%
Other 1 <1%
Unknown 254 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 51 19%
Researcher 31 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 30 11%
Other 21 8%
Student > Bachelor 20 8%
Other 48 18%
Unknown 63 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 107 41%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 18 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 17 6%
Psychology 9 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 2%
Other 33 13%
Unknown 74 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 November 2023.
All research outputs
#2,643,624
of 25,864,668 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#5,177
of 13,146 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,715
of 108,594 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#19
of 85 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,864,668 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,146 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 33.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 108,594 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 85 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.