You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Parenteral versus oral iron therapy for adults and children with chronic kidney disease
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd007857.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jumana Albaramki, Elisabeth M Hodson, Jonathan C Craig, Angela C Webster |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 131 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 2 | 2% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Poland | 1 | <1% |
| Singapore | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 126 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 23 | 18% |
| Researcher | 16 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 16 | 12% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 15 | 11% |
| Other | 7 | 5% |
| Other | 22 | 17% |
| Unknown | 32 | 24% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 57 | 44% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 11 | 8% |
| Psychology | 5 | 4% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 4% |
| Social Sciences | 4 | 3% |
| Other | 13 | 10% |
| Unknown | 36 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 January 2018.
All research outputs
#7,496,217
of 25,756,911 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#8,963
of 13,137 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#61,716
of 253,244 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#130
of 235 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,756,911 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,137 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.9. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 253,244 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 235 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.