↓ Skip to main content

Adjunctive hyperbaric oxygen for necrotizing fasciitis

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (84th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
blogs
2 blogs
twitter
8 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
87 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
202 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Adjunctive hyperbaric oxygen for necrotizing fasciitis
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2015
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd007937.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Denny Z Levett, Michael H Bennett, Ian Millar

Abstract

Hyperbaric oxygen therapy (HBOT) involves the therapeutic administration of 100% oxygen in a pressure chamber at pressures above one atmosphere absolute. This therapy has been used as an adjunct to surgery and antibiotics in the treatment of patients with necrotizing fasciitis with the aim of reducing morbidity and mortality.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 202 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Andorra 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Singapore 1 <1%
Unknown 198 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 27 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 19 9%
Student > Bachelor 19 9%
Researcher 14 7%
Other 14 7%
Other 41 20%
Unknown 68 34%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 80 40%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 4%
Computer Science 5 2%
Psychology 5 2%
Social Sciences 5 2%
Other 20 10%
Unknown 79 39%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 43. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 November 2022.
All research outputs
#932,568
of 24,820,264 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#1,896
of 12,983 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,530
of 391,281 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#44
of 280 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,820,264 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,983 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 391,281 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 280 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.