You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Comparison of different regimens of proton pump inhibitors for acute peptic ulcer bleeding
|
---|---|
Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2013
|
DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd007999.pub2 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Ignacio Neumann, Luz M Letelier, Gabriel Rada, Juan Carlos Claro, Janet Martin, Colin W Howden, Yuhong Yuan, Grigorios I Leontiadis |
Abstract |
Treatment with proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) improves clinical outcomes in patients with peptic ulcer bleeding. However, the optimal dose and route of administration of PPIs remains controversial. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Chile | 3 | 38% |
United States | 2 | 25% |
Colombia | 1 | 13% |
Bahrain | 1 | 13% |
Unknown | 1 | 13% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 6 | 75% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 213 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Brazil | 2 | <1% |
Colombia | 1 | <1% |
United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 209 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 27 | 13% |
Researcher | 23 | 11% |
Other | 22 | 10% |
Student > Bachelor | 19 | 9% |
Student > Postgraduate | 18 | 8% |
Other | 49 | 23% |
Unknown | 55 | 26% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 97 | 46% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 13 | 6% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 12 | 6% |
Psychology | 4 | 2% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 2% |
Other | 22 | 10% |
Unknown | 61 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 March 2022.
All research outputs
#2,732,148
of 25,457,858 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#5,344
of 11,842 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#23,056
of 210,015 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#134
of 315 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,457,858 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,842 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 38.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 210,015 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 315 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its contemporaries.