You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Staples versus sutures for closing leg wounds after vein graft harvesting for coronary artery bypass surgery.
|
---|---|
Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, May 2010
|
DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd008057.pub2 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Fausto Biancari, Valentina Tiozzo |
Abstract |
Surgical site infection (SSI) after saphenous vein graft harvesting is a complication occurring in up to 18% of patients who undergo coronary artery bypass surgery (CABG). It is not known whether the method of skin closure influences the infection rate. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Mexico | 1 | 33% |
Unknown | 2 | 67% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 3 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 76 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Singapore | 1 | 1% |
Unknown | 75 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 14 | 18% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 8 | 11% |
Student > Bachelor | 7 | 9% |
Student > Postgraduate | 6 | 8% |
Researcher | 5 | 7% |
Other | 12 | 16% |
Unknown | 24 | 32% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 27 | 36% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 6 | 8% |
Psychology | 4 | 5% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 3 | 4% |
Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 2 | 3% |
Other | 7 | 9% |
Unknown | 27 | 36% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2024.
All research outputs
#4,680,617
of 25,457,858 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#6,852
of 11,842 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#19,303
of 103,871 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#30
of 76 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,457,858 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,842 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 38.9. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 103,871 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 76 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its contemporaries.