↓ Skip to main content

Distal aortic perfusion during thoracoabdominal aneurysm repair for prevention of paraplegia

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (70th percentile)

Citations

dimensions_citation
18 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
85 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Distal aortic perfusion during thoracoabdominal aneurysm repair for prevention of paraplegia
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2012
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd008197.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Charlie C‐T Hsu, Gigi NC Kwan, Mieke L van Driel, John A Rophael

Abstract

During thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm (TAAA) surgery, decreased spinal cord perfusion can result in neurological deficits such as paraplegia and paraparesis. Distal aortic perfusion, alone or in combination with other adjuncts, may counter the decrease in spinal cord perfusion and hence reduce the risk of spinal cord injury.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 85 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 1%
Unknown 84 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 13 15%
Student > Master 11 13%
Student > Bachelor 10 12%
Other 9 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 6%
Other 13 15%
Unknown 24 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 39 46%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 2%
Psychology 2 2%
Computer Science 1 1%
Other 5 6%
Unknown 30 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 June 2016.
All research outputs
#7,387,249
of 25,457,297 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#8,415
of 11,499 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#46,752
of 169,202 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#123
of 177 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,457,297 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,499 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 40.0. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 169,202 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 177 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.