↓ Skip to main content

Nutritional support for liver disease

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, May 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (77th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
policy
1 policy source
twitter
4 X users
patent
1 patent
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
132 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
414 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Nutritional support for liver disease
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, May 2012
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd008344.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ronald L Koretz, Alison Avenell, Timothy O Lipman

Abstract

Weight loss and muscle wasting are commonly found in patients with end-stage liver disease. Since there is an association between malnutrition and poor clinical outcome, such patients (or those at risk of becoming malnourished) are often given parenteral nutrition, enteral nutrition, or oral nutritional supplements. These interventions have costs and adverse effects, so it is important to prove that their use results in improved morbidity or mortality, or both.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 414 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Ireland 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
Unknown 405 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 70 17%
Researcher 55 13%
Student > Bachelor 52 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 35 8%
Other 29 7%
Other 90 22%
Unknown 83 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 169 41%
Nursing and Health Professions 53 13%
Social Sciences 17 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 13 3%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 13 3%
Other 46 11%
Unknown 103 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 18. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 August 2022.
All research outputs
#2,022,365
of 25,457,858 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#4,275
of 11,842 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,832
of 176,582 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#42
of 185 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,457,858 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,842 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 38.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 176,582 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 185 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.