↓ Skip to main content

Interventions for treating leg ulcers in people with sickle cell disease

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, November 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
17 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
50 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Interventions for treating leg ulcers in people with sickle cell disease
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, November 2012
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd008394.pub2
Pubmed ID
Abstract

The frequency of skin ulceration makes it an important contributor to the morbidity burden in people with sickle cell disease. Many treatment options are available to the healthcare professional, although it is uncertain which treatments have been assessed for effectiveness in people with sickle cell disease.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 50 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 2 4%
Spain 1 2%
Unknown 47 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 6 12%
Student > Postgraduate 6 12%
Student > Bachelor 6 12%
Student > Master 6 12%
Other 4 8%
Other 8 16%
Unknown 14 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 13 26%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 8%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 4%
Psychology 2 4%
Other 9 18%
Unknown 16 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 December 2012.
All research outputs
#14,921,638
of 25,595,500 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#10,777
of 13,156 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#167,164
of 285,368 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#208
of 268 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,595,500 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,156 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.8. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 285,368 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 268 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.