↓ Skip to main content

Atypical antipsychotics for disruptive behaviour disorders in children and youths

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (86th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (51st percentile)

Citations

dimensions_citation
91 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
201 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Atypical antipsychotics for disruptive behaviour disorders in children and youths
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2012
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd008559.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Loy JH, Merry SN, Hetrick SE, Stasiak K, Loy, Jik H, Merry, Sally N, Hetrick, Sarah E, Stasiak, Karolina

Abstract

Disruptive behaviour disorders include conduct disorder, oppositional defiant disorder and disruptive behaviour not otherwise specified. Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) is frequently associated with disruptive behaviour disorders. The difficulties associated with disruptive behaviour disorders are demonstrated through aggression and severe behavioural problems. These often result in presentation to psychiatric services and may be treated with medications such as atypical antipsychotics. There is increasing evidence of a significant rise in the use of atypical antipsychotics for treating disruptive behaviour disorders in child and adolescent populations.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 201 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 2 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 195 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 35 17%
Student > Master 29 14%
Student > Bachelor 24 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 23 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 18 9%
Other 46 23%
Unknown 26 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 81 40%
Psychology 36 18%
Nursing and Health Professions 14 7%
Social Sciences 11 5%
Neuroscience 8 4%
Other 20 10%
Unknown 31 15%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 September 2019.
All research outputs
#3,674,314
of 25,654,806 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#6,372
of 13,153 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#25,504
of 187,754 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#112
of 231 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,654,806 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,153 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 187,754 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 231 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.