You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Umbilical cord antiseptics for preventing sepsis and death among newborns
|
---|---|
Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, May 2013
|
DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd008635.pub2 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Aamer Imdad, Resti Ma M Bautista, Kathlynne Anne A Senen, Ma Esterlita V Uy, Jacinto Blas Mantaring, Zulfiqar A Bhutta |
Abstract |
The umbilical cord is a structure made of blood vessels and connective tissue that connects the baby and placenta in utero. The umbilical cord is cut after birth, which separates the mother and her baby both physically and symbolically. Omphalitis is defined as infection of the umbilical cord stump. Tracking of bacteria along the umbilical vessels may lead to septicaemia that can result in neonatal morbidity and mortality, especially in developing countries. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 31 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Spain | 13 | 42% |
Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of | 2 | 6% |
Argentina | 2 | 6% |
Australia | 1 | 3% |
Canada | 1 | 3% |
United Kingdom | 1 | 3% |
United States | 1 | 3% |
Unknown | 10 | 32% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 29 | 94% |
Scientists | 1 | 3% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 431 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Ethiopia | 1 | <1% |
United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
Singapore | 1 | <1% |
Iran, Islamic Republic of | 1 | <1% |
Argentina | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 426 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 77 | 18% |
Student > Bachelor | 55 | 13% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 42 | 10% |
Researcher | 38 | 9% |
Other | 27 | 6% |
Other | 69 | 16% |
Unknown | 123 | 29% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 153 | 35% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 71 | 16% |
Social Sciences | 25 | 6% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 11 | 3% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 5 | 1% |
Other | 38 | 9% |
Unknown | 128 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 31. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 January 2023.
All research outputs
#1,295,859
of 25,770,491 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,703
of 13,137 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,292
of 208,030 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#53
of 285 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,770,491 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,137 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 33.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 208,030 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 285 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.