You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Stapler versus scalpel resection followed by hand‐sewn closure of the pancreatic remnant for distal pancreatectomy
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, November 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd008688.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Pascal Probst, Felix J Hüttner, Ulla Klaiber, Phillip Knebel, Alexis Ulrich, Markus W Büchler, Markus K Diener |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 50% |
| Canada | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 50% |
| Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 151 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 151 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 22 | 15% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 17 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 15 | 10% |
| Researcher | 14 | 9% |
| Other | 10 | 7% |
| Other | 20 | 13% |
| Unknown | 53 | 35% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 55 | 36% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 16 | 11% |
| Psychology | 5 | 3% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 3 | 2% |
| Engineering | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 10 | 7% |
| Unknown | 59 | 39% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 November 2015.
All research outputs
#16,689,742
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#11,265
of 13,168 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#164,644
of 301,177 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#263
of 301 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,168 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.9. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 301,177 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 301 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.