You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Cardiac testing for coronary artery disease in potential kidney transplant recipients
|
---|---|
Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2011
|
DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd008691.pub2 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Louis W Wang, Magid A Fahim, Andrew Hayen, Ruth L Mitchell, Laura Baines, Stephen Lord, Jonathan C Craig, Angela C Webster |
Abstract |
Patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) are at increased risk of coronary artery disease (CAD) and adverse cardiac events. Screening for CAD is therefore an important part of preoperative evaluation for kidney transplant candidates. There is significant interest in the role of non-invasive cardiac investigations and their ability to identify patients at high risk of CAD. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 1 | 33% |
United States | 1 | 33% |
Unknown | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 2 | 67% |
Scientists | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 256 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Australia | 2 | <1% |
Canada | 1 | <1% |
Brazil | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 252 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 45 | 18% |
Student > Bachelor | 30 | 12% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 27 | 11% |
Other | 21 | 8% |
Researcher | 21 | 8% |
Other | 50 | 20% |
Unknown | 62 | 24% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 120 | 47% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 15 | 6% |
Psychology | 10 | 4% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 8 | 3% |
Social Sciences | 7 | 3% |
Other | 24 | 9% |
Unknown | 72 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 February 2020.
All research outputs
#3,152,263
of 25,457,858 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#5,804
of 11,499 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#23,077
of 247,349 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#77
of 209 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,457,858 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,499 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 40.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 247,349 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 209 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.