↓ Skip to main content

Psychodynamic therapies versus other psychological therapies for depression

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (79th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet

Citations

dimensions_citation
4 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
162 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Psychodynamic therapies versus other psychological therapies for depression
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2010
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd008706
Pubmed ID
Authors

Rachel Churchill, Theresa Hm Moore, Philippa Davies, Deborah Caldwell, Hannah Jones, Glyn Lewis, Vivien Hunot

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 162 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
South Africa 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Unknown 160 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 35 22%
Student > Bachelor 28 17%
Researcher 15 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 9%
Student > Postgraduate 12 7%
Other 23 14%
Unknown 34 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 60 37%
Medicine and Dentistry 27 17%
Nursing and Health Professions 9 6%
Social Sciences 9 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 2%
Other 17 10%
Unknown 36 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 September 2020.
All research outputs
#4,857,628
of 25,457,297 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#6,973
of 11,499 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20,241
of 104,970 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#44
of 79 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,457,297 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,499 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 40.0. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 104,970 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 79 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.