You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Conservative interventions for treating work‐related complaints of the arm, neck or shoulder in adults
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd008742.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Arianne P Verhagen, Sita MA Bierma‐Zeinstra, Alex Burdorf, Siobhán M Stynes, Henrica CW de Vet, Bart W Koes |
| Abstract |
Work-related upper limb disorder (WRULD), repetitive strain injury (RSI), occupational overuse syndrome (OOS) and work-related complaints of the arm, neck or shoulder (CANS) are the most frequently used umbrella terms for disorders that develop as a result of repetitive movements, awkward postures and impact of external forces such as those associated with operating vibrating tools. Work-related CANS, which is the term we use in this review, severely hampers the working population. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 22 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 4 | 18% |
| Finland | 2 | 9% |
| Spain | 2 | 9% |
| Australia | 1 | 5% |
| Bolivia, Plurinational State of | 1 | 5% |
| Canada | 1 | 5% |
| Sweden | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 10 | 45% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 20 | 91% |
| Scientists | 2 | 9% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 489 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | <1% |
| Colombia | 1 | <1% |
| Portugal | 1 | <1% |
| Belgium | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 483 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 94 | 19% |
| Student > Bachelor | 59 | 12% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 42 | 9% |
| Researcher | 34 | 7% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 30 | 6% |
| Other | 83 | 17% |
| Unknown | 147 | 30% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 147 | 30% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 70 | 14% |
| Psychology | 27 | 6% |
| Sports and Recreations | 15 | 3% |
| Social Sciences | 14 | 3% |
| Other | 52 | 11% |
| Unknown | 164 | 34% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 22. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 August 2023.
All research outputs
#1,697,405
of 25,457,858 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3,630
of 11,842 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#18,511
of 320,775 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#73
of 216 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,457,858 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,842 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 38.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 320,775 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 216 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.