You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Combination versus sequential single agent chemotherapy for metastatic breast cancer
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd008792.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Rachel F Dear, Kevin McGeechan, Marisa C Jenkins, Alexandra Barratt, Martin HN Tattersall, Nicholas Wilcken |
| Abstract |
Combination chemotherapy can cause greater tumour cell kill if the drug dose is not compromised, while sequential single agent chemotherapy may allow for greater dose intensity and treatment time, potentially meaning greater benefit from each single agent. In addition, sequentially using single agents might cause less toxicity and impairment of quality of life, but it is not known whether this might compromise survival time. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 2 | 18% |
| Mexico | 1 | 9% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 9% |
| Unknown | 7 | 64% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 8 | 73% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 18% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 9% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 338 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 4 | 1% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | <1% |
| Colombia | 1 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Japan | 1 | <1% |
| Mexico | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 328 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 54 | 16% |
| Student > Bachelor | 39 | 12% |
| Researcher | 38 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 33 | 10% |
| Other | 27 | 8% |
| Other | 53 | 16% |
| Unknown | 94 | 28% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 104 | 31% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 38 | 11% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 27 | 8% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 12 | 4% |
| Psychology | 11 | 3% |
| Other | 48 | 14% |
| Unknown | 98 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 19. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 September 2020.
All research outputs
#1,946,696
of 25,595,500 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#4,196
of 13,156 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#21,341
of 321,321 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#85
of 235 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,595,500 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,156 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 321,321 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 235 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.