↓ Skip to main content

Prenatal versus postnatal repair procedures for spina bifida for improving infant and maternal outcomes

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
36 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
328 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Prenatal versus postnatal repair procedures for spina bifida for improving infant and maternal outcomes
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2014
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd008825.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Rosalie M Grivell, Chad Andersen, Jodie M Dodd

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 328 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Ethiopia 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Egypt 1 <1%
Unknown 325 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 57 17%
Student > Bachelor 44 13%
Researcher 32 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 28 9%
Student > Postgraduate 22 7%
Other 57 17%
Unknown 88 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 128 39%
Nursing and Health Professions 38 12%
Social Sciences 12 4%
Psychology 12 4%
Unspecified 9 3%
Other 36 11%
Unknown 93 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 March 2021.
All research outputs
#8,296,578
of 25,457,858 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#8,927
of 11,842 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#87,544
of 274,159 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#203
of 247 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,457,858 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 66th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,842 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 38.9. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 274,159 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 247 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.