You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Spinal manipulative therapy for acute low‐back pain
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd008880.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Sidney M Rubinstein, Caroline B Terwee, Willem JJ Assendelft, Michiel R de Boer, Maurits W van Tulder |
| Abstract |
Many therapies exist for the treatment of low-back pain including spinal manipulative therapy (SMT), which is a worldwide, extensively practised intervention. This report is an update of the earlier Cochrane review, first published in January 2004 with the last search for studies up to January 2000. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 200 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 29 | 14% |
| United States | 20 | 10% |
| Canada | 11 | 6% |
| Spain | 10 | 5% |
| Netherlands | 7 | 4% |
| Australia | 5 | 3% |
| Sweden | 4 | 2% |
| France | 4 | 2% |
| Italy | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 23 | 12% |
| Unknown | 84 | 42% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 152 | 76% |
| Scientists | 30 | 15% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 12 | 6% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 6 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 581 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Chile | 1 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| South Africa | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 571 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 111 | 19% |
| Student > Bachelor | 111 | 19% |
| Researcher | 42 | 7% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 38 | 7% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 35 | 6% |
| Other | 111 | 19% |
| Unknown | 133 | 23% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 192 | 33% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 106 | 18% |
| Psychology | 27 | 5% |
| Sports and Recreations | 26 | 4% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 14 | 2% |
| Other | 56 | 10% |
| Unknown | 160 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 273. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 April 2024.
All research outputs
#133,645
of 25,743,152 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#242
of 13,136 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#586
of 188,000 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#8
of 228 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,743,152 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,136 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 33.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 188,000 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 228 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.