You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Restorative justice conferencing for reducing recidivism in young offenders (aged 7 to 21)
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd008898.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Nuala Livingstone, Geraldine Macdonald, Nicola Carr |
| Abstract |
Restorative justice is "a process whereby parties with a stake in a specific offence resolve collectively how to deal with the aftermath of the offence and its implications for the future" (Marshall 2003). Despite the increasing use of restorative justice programmes as an alternative to court proceedings, no systematic review has been undertaken of the available evidence on the effectiveness of these programmes with young offenders. Recidivism in young offenders is a particularly worrying problem, as recent surveys have indicated the frequency of re-offences for young offenders has ranged from 40.2% in 2000 to 37.8% in 2007 (Ministry of Justice 2009) |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 3 | 21% |
| United States | 2 | 14% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 7% |
| Indonesia | 1 | 7% |
| Unknown | 7 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 13 | 93% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 7% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 241 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 240 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 36 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 32 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 29 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 27 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 16 | 7% |
| Other | 47 | 20% |
| Unknown | 54 | 22% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 44 | 18% |
| Psychology | 43 | 18% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 42 | 17% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 13 | 5% |
| Unspecified | 13 | 5% |
| Other | 21 | 9% |
| Unknown | 65 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 35. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 January 2023.
All research outputs
#1,191,648
of 25,888,937 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,349
of 13,154 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,462
of 206,115 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#36
of 208 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,888,937 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,154 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 206,115 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 208 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.