↓ Skip to main content

Pain management for rheumatoid arthritis and cardiovascular or renal comorbidity

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (88th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (61st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
10 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
32 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
229 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Pain management for rheumatoid arthritis and cardiovascular or renal comorbidity
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2011
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd008952.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jonathan L Marks, Alexandra N Colebatch, Rachelle Buchbinder, Christopher J Edwards

Abstract

Pain in rheumatoid arthritis is common, is often multi-factorial and many different pharmacotherapeutic agents are routinely used for pain management. There are concerns that some of the pain pharmacotherapies currently used may increase the risk of adverse events in people with rheumatoid arthritis and concurrent cardiovascular or renal disease.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 229 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Colombia 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Norway 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Sri Lanka 1 <1%
Unknown 223 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 33 14%
Student > Master 31 14%
Student > Bachelor 28 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 25 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 16 7%
Other 30 13%
Unknown 66 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 74 32%
Nursing and Health Professions 16 7%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 14 6%
Psychology 13 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 4%
Other 21 9%
Unknown 82 36%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 June 2023.
All research outputs
#3,127,241
of 25,457,297 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#5,754
of 11,499 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#16,238
of 144,881 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#48
of 125 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,457,297 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,499 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 40.0. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 144,881 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 125 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.