↓ Skip to main content

Factor Xa inhibitors versus vitamin K antagonists for preventing cerebral or systemic embolism in patients with atrial fibrillation

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, August 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (74th percentile)

Citations

dimensions_citation
61 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
157 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Factor Xa inhibitors versus vitamin K antagonists for preventing cerebral or systemic embolism in patients with atrial fibrillation
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, August 2013
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd008980.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Karsten MH Bruins Slot, Eivind Berge

Abstract

Anticoagulant treatment with vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) is aimed at preventing thromboembolic complications and has been the therapy of choice for most people with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (AF) for many decades. A new class of anticoagulants, the factor Xa inhibitors, appear to have several pharmacological and practical advantages over VKAs.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 15 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 157 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 2%
France 2 1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Colombia 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Slovenia 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 146 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 30 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 22 14%
Student > Bachelor 20 13%
Researcher 18 11%
Student > Postgraduate 14 9%
Other 38 24%
Unknown 15 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 95 61%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 11 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 4%
Psychology 5 3%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 3%
Other 12 8%
Unknown 23 15%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 27. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 February 2024.
All research outputs
#1,455,093
of 25,595,500 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3,132
of 13,156 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,224
of 209,444 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#66
of 252 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,595,500 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,156 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 209,444 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 252 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.