You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Interventions for hiring, retaining and training district health systems managers in low‐ and middle‐income countries
|
---|---|
Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2013
|
DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd009035.pub2 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Peter C Rockers, Till Bärnighausen |
Abstract |
District managers are playing an increasingly important role in determining the performance of health systems in low- and middle-income countries as a result of decentralization. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 1 | 33% |
United Kingdom | 1 | 33% |
Unknown | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 3 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 257 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Uganda | 1 | <1% |
India | 1 | <1% |
United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
Sierra Leone | 1 | <1% |
United States | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 252 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 53 | 21% |
Researcher | 39 | 15% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 32 | 12% |
Student > Bachelor | 18 | 7% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 10 | 4% |
Other | 38 | 15% |
Unknown | 67 | 26% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 75 | 29% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 33 | 13% |
Social Sciences | 32 | 12% |
Business, Management and Accounting | 10 | 4% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 2% |
Other | 26 | 10% |
Unknown | 76 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 May 2013.
All research outputs
#16,042,687
of 25,457,297 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#10,231
of 11,499 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#118,465
of 204,400 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#215
of 248 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,457,297 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,499 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 40.0. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 204,400 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 248 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.