You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Breathing exercises for dysfunctional breathing/hyperventilation syndrome in adults
|
---|---|
Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, May 2013
|
DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd009041.pub2 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Mandy Jones, Alex Harvey, Louise Marston, Neil E O'Connell |
Abstract |
Dysfunctional breathing/hyperventilation syndrome (DB/HVS) is a respiratory disorder, psychologically or physiologically based, involving breathing too deeply and/or too rapidly (hyperventilation) or erratic breathing interspersed with breath-holding or sighing (DB). DB/HVS can result in significant patient morbidity and an array of symptoms including breathlessness, chest tightness, dizziness, tremor and paraesthesia. DB/HVS has an estimated prevalence of 9.5% in the general adult population, however, there is little consensus regarding the most effective management of this patient group. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Belgium | 3 | 27% |
United Kingdom | 3 | 27% |
Unknown | 5 | 45% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 8 | 73% |
Scientists | 3 | 27% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 257 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Italy | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 256 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 52 | 20% |
Student > Bachelor | 30 | 12% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 18 | 7% |
Researcher | 17 | 7% |
Other | 12 | 5% |
Other | 32 | 12% |
Unknown | 96 | 37% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 78 | 30% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 31 | 12% |
Psychology | 12 | 5% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 6 | 2% |
Sports and Recreations | 4 | 2% |
Other | 22 | 9% |
Unknown | 104 | 40% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 September 2023.
All research outputs
#3,627,321
of 25,595,500 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#6,341
of 13,156 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#30,208
of 207,546 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#138
of 286 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,595,500 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,156 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 207,546 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 286 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.