↓ Skip to main content

Intracutaneous or subcutaneous sterile water injection compared with blinded controls for pain management in labour

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (87th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
38 X users
facebook
3 Facebook pages
wikipedia
5 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
79 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
379 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Intracutaneous or subcutaneous sterile water injection compared with blinded controls for pain management in labour
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2012
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd009107.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sheena Derry, Sebastian Straube, R Andrew Moore, Heather Hancock, Sally L Collins

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 38 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 379 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Iran, Islamic Republic of 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 375 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 52 14%
Student > Bachelor 48 13%
Researcher 42 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 29 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 23 6%
Other 81 21%
Unknown 104 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 119 31%
Nursing and Health Professions 63 17%
Psychology 25 7%
Social Sciences 18 5%
Unspecified 7 2%
Other 34 9%
Unknown 113 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 30. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 February 2024.
All research outputs
#1,311,243
of 25,513,063 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,798
of 13,145 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,452
of 252,057 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#31
of 237 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,513,063 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,145 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 252,057 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 237 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.