↓ Skip to main content

Routine neonatal circumcision for the prevention of urinary tract infections in infancy

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, May 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (64th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
wikipedia
4 Wikipedia pages

Readers on

mendeley
3 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Routine neonatal circumcision for the prevention of urinary tract infections in infancy
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, May 2011
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd009129
Authors

Jagannath, Vanitha A, Fedorowicz, Zbys, Sud, Vikas, Verma, Abhishek Kumar, Hajebrahimi, Sakineh, Vanitha A Jagannath, Zbys Fedorowicz, Vikas Sud, Abhishek Kumar Verma, Sakineh Hajebrahimi

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 3 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 3 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 2 67%
Student > Master 1 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Chemical Engineering 2 67%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 January 2016.
All research outputs
#6,949,323
of 22,787,797 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#8,566
of 12,314 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#37,661
of 109,859 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#55
of 89 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,787,797 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,314 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.4. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 109,859 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 89 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.