↓ Skip to main content

Polyclonal anti‐thymocyte globulins for the prophylaxis of graft‐versus‐host disease after allogeneic stem cell or bone marrow transplantation in adults

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
59 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
176 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Polyclonal anti‐thymocyte globulins for the prophylaxis of graft‐versus‐host disease after allogeneic stem cell or bone marrow transplantation in adults
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2012
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd009159.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sebastian Theurich<sup>a</sup>, Hans Fischmann<sup>a</sup>, Alexander Shimabukuro‐Vornhagen, Jens M Chemnitz, Udo Holtick, Christof Scheid, Nicole Skoetz<sup>a</sup>, Michael von Bergwelt‐Baildon<sup>a</sup>

Abstract

Allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) is an established treatment for many malignant and non-malignant haematological disorders. Graft-versus-host disease (GVHD), a condition frequently occurring after HSCT, is the result of host tissues being attacked by donor immune cells. One strategy for the prevention of GVHD is the administration of anti-thymocyte globulins (ATG), a set of polyclonal antibodies directed against a variety of immune cell epitopes, leading to immunosuppression and immunomodulation.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 176 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Unknown 173 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 28 16%
Student > Bachelor 28 16%
Researcher 20 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 10%
Student > Postgraduate 13 7%
Other 26 15%
Unknown 44 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 76 43%
Nursing and Health Professions 12 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 8 5%
Immunology and Microbiology 7 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 3%
Other 21 12%
Unknown 46 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 September 2012.
All research outputs
#20,817,194
of 25,576,801 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#12,261
of 13,155 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#146,976
of 187,638 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#219
of 231 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,576,801 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,155 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.8. This one is in the 2nd percentile – i.e., 2% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 187,638 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 231 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 3rd percentile – i.e., 3% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.