↓ Skip to main content

Knowledge translation interventions for facilitating evidence‐informed decision‐making amongst health policymakers

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (86th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
49 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
27 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
85 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Knowledge translation interventions for facilitating evidence‐informed decision‐making amongst health policymakers
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2011
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd009181
Authors

Rebecca Armstrong, Elizabeth Waters, Maureen Dobbins, John N Lavis, Mark Petticrew, Robin Christensen

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 49 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 85 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 85 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 8 9%
Researcher 5 6%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 6%
Student > Bachelor 4 5%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 2%
Other 6 7%
Unknown 55 65%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 13 15%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 6%
Psychology 3 4%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 1%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 1%
Other 4 5%
Unknown 58 68%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 29. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 October 2022.
All research outputs
#1,340,446
of 25,457,858 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,839
of 11,499 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,566
of 126,447 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#14
of 99 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,457,858 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,499 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 40.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 126,447 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 99 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.