You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Local anaesthetic nerve block for pain management in labour
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd009200.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Natalia Novikova, Catherine Cluver |
| Abstract |
Local anaesthetic nerve block is an important modality for pain management in labour. Pudendal and paracervical block (PCB) are most commonly performed local anaesthetic nerve blocks which have been used for decades. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Denmark | 1 | 20% |
| Unknown | 4 | 80% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 5 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 216 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 212 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 34 | 16% |
| Researcher | 27 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 21 | 10% |
| Unspecified | 15 | 7% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 13 | 6% |
| Other | 43 | 20% |
| Unknown | 63 | 29% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 74 | 34% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 25 | 12% |
| Unspecified | 15 | 7% |
| Psychology | 14 | 6% |
| Social Sciences | 9 | 4% |
| Other | 15 | 7% |
| Unknown | 64 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 September 2022.
All research outputs
#5,164,229
of 25,457,858 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#7,072
of 11,842 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#32,557
of 174,458 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#102
of 187 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,457,858 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,842 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 38.9. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 174,458 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 187 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.