↓ Skip to main content

Workplace pedometer interventions for increasing physical activity

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (65th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
24 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
77 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
529 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Workplace pedometer interventions for increasing physical activity
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2013
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd009209.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Rosanne LA Freak‐Poli, Miranda Cumpston, Anna Peeters, Stacy A Clemes

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 24 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 529 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 6 1%
Germany 2 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Ireland 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 518 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 106 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 80 15%
Researcher 76 14%
Student > Bachelor 57 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 30 6%
Other 89 17%
Unknown 91 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 152 29%
Psychology 56 11%
Nursing and Health Professions 51 10%
Social Sciences 47 9%
Sports and Recreations 31 6%
Other 81 15%
Unknown 111 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 April 2018.
All research outputs
#2,245,142
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#4,641
of 13,149 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#18,195
of 207,755 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#91
of 264 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,149 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 207,755 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 264 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.