↓ Skip to main content

Ketamine for management of acute exacerbations of asthma in children

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, November 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (72nd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
2 blogs
twitter
10 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
6 Wikipedia pages
googleplus
1 Google+ user
f1000
1 research highlight platform

Citations

dimensions_citation
57 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
252 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Ketamine for management of acute exacerbations of asthma in children
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, November 2012
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd009293.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kana R Jat, Deepak Chawla

Abstract

Asthma is the most common chronic disease in children, and children with asthma frequently visit the paediatric emergency departments with acute exacerbations. Some of these children fail to respond to standard therapy (aerosol beta(2)-agonist with or without aerosol anticholinergic and oral or parenteral corticosteroids) for acute asthma leading to prolonged emergency department stay, hospitalisation, morbidity (e.g. barotrauma, intubation) and death, albeit rarely. Ketamine may relieve bronchospasm and is a potentially promising therapy for children with acute asthma who fail to respond to standard treatment.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 252 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Unknown 248 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 31 12%
Student > Master 30 12%
Student > Bachelor 21 8%
Other 19 8%
Student > Postgraduate 15 6%
Other 56 22%
Unknown 80 32%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 89 35%
Nursing and Health Professions 29 12%
Social Sciences 11 4%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 8 3%
Psychology 6 2%
Other 18 7%
Unknown 91 36%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 24. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 December 2023.
All research outputs
#1,605,223
of 25,595,500 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3,445
of 13,156 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,989
of 192,979 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#69
of 245 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,595,500 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,156 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 192,979 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 245 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.