You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Inhaled analgesia for pain management in labour
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd009351.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Trudy Klomp, Mireille van Poppel, Leanne Jones, Janine Lazet, Marcello Di Nisio, Antoine LM Lagro‐Janssen |
| Abstract |
Many women would like to have a choice in pain relief during labour and also would like to avoid invasive methods of pain management in labour. Inhaled analgesia during labour involves the self-administered inhalation of sub-anaesthetic concentrations of agents while the mother remains awake and her protective laryngeal reflexes remain intact. Most of the agents are easy to administer, can be started in less than a minute and become effective within a minute. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 19 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 3 | 16% |
| Spain | 2 | 11% |
| United States | 1 | 5% |
| Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of | 1 | 5% |
| Australia | 1 | 5% |
| Mexico | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 10 | 53% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 15 | 79% |
| Scientists | 2 | 11% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 11% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 441 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 2 | <1% |
| Colombia | 1 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Singapore | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 434 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 68 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 59 | 13% |
| Researcher | 46 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 33 | 7% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 25 | 6% |
| Other | 76 | 17% |
| Unknown | 134 | 30% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 149 | 34% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 72 | 16% |
| Psychology | 17 | 4% |
| Social Sciences | 15 | 3% |
| Unspecified | 7 | 2% |
| Other | 37 | 8% |
| Unknown | 144 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 55. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 December 2023.
All research outputs
#781,688
of 25,595,500 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#1,470
of 13,156 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,136
of 187,712 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#32
of 231 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,595,500 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,156 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 187,712 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 231 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.