↓ Skip to main content

Hypnosis for pain management during labour and childbirth

Overview of attention for article published in this source, November 2012
Altmetric Badge

Citations

dimensions_citation
69 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
140 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Hypnosis for pain management during labour and childbirth
Published by
John Wiley & Sons, Ltd, November 2012
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd009356.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Madden, Kelly, Middleton, Philippa, Cyna, Allan M, Matthewson, Mandy, Jones, Leanne

Abstract

This review is one in a series of Cochrane Reviews investigating pain management for childbirth. These reviews all contribute to an overview of systematic reviews of pain management for women in labour, and share a generic protocol. We examined the current evidence regarding the use of hypnosis for pain management during labour and childbirth. This review updates the findings regarding hypnosis from an earlier review of complementary and alternative therapies for pain management in labour into a stand-alone review.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 140 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 1%
Canada 2 1%
Ethiopia 1 <1%
Unknown 135 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 24 17%
Student > Master 18 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 10%
Researcher 10 7%
Student > Postgraduate 9 6%
Other 33 24%
Unknown 32 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 52 37%
Nursing and Health Professions 19 14%
Psychology 12 9%
Social Sciences 11 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 5%
Other 2 1%
Unknown 37 26%