↓ Skip to main content

Surgical versus conservative interventions for treating fractures of the middle third of the clavicle

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (67th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
1 blog
policy
1 policy source
twitter
5 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
80 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
142 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Surgical versus conservative interventions for treating fractures of the middle third of the clavicle
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2013
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd009363.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mário Lenza, Rachelle Buchbinder, Renea V Johnston, João Carlos Belloti, Flávio Faloppa

Abstract

Clavicle fractures are common, accounting for 2.6% to 4% of all fractures. Eighty per cent of clavicle fractures are located in the middle third of the clavicle. Although treatment of these fractures is usually non-surgical, displaced clavicle fractures may be considered for surgical treatment because of their greater risk of non-union.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 142 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Colombia 1 <1%
Korea, Republic of 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Unknown 137 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 29 20%
Student > Bachelor 17 12%
Researcher 16 11%
Student > Postgraduate 14 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 10%
Other 39 27%
Unknown 13 9%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 87 61%
Nursing and Health Professions 12 8%
Psychology 7 5%
Social Sciences 3 2%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 1%
Other 10 7%
Unknown 21 15%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 21. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 August 2019.
All research outputs
#1,791,399
of 25,457,297 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3,821
of 11,499 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,945
of 210,295 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#90
of 281 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,457,297 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,499 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 40.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 210,295 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 281 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.