You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Primary school‐based behavioural interventions for preventing caries
|
---|---|
Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2011
|
DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd009378 |
Authors |
Anna M Cooper, Lucy A O'Malley, Sarah N Elison, Rosemary Armstrong, Valerie A Featherstone, Girvan Burnside, Pauline Adair, Lindsey Dugdill, Cynthia Pine, Cooper, Anna M, O'Malley, Lucy A, Elison, Sarah N, Armstrong, Rosemary, Featherstone, Valerie A, Burnside, Girvan, Adair, Pauline, Dugdill, Lindsey, Pine, Cynthia |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 1 | 50% |
Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 14 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 14 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 29% |
Student > Master | 3 | 21% |
Lecturer | 2 | 14% |
Researcher | 2 | 14% |
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer | 1 | 7% |
Other | 1 | 7% |
Unknown | 1 | 7% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 4 | 29% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 14% |
Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 7% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 7% |
Computer Science | 1 | 7% |
Other | 3 | 21% |
Unknown | 2 | 14% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 February 2017.
All research outputs
#13,411,291
of 22,760,687 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#10,079
of 12,314 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#82,924
of 133,075 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#101
of 126 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,760,687 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,314 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.4. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 133,075 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 126 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.