You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Helminth therapy (worms) for induction of remission in inflammatory bowel disease
|
---|---|
Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2014
|
DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd009400.pub2 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Sushil K Garg, Ashley M Croft, Peter Bager |
Abstract |
Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is a chronic, globally-occurring gastrointestinal disorder and a major cause of illness and disability. It is conventionally classified into Crohn's disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC). Helminths are parasitic worms with complex life cycles involving tissue- or lumen-dwelling stages in their hosts, and causing long-lasting or chronic infections that are frequently asymptomatic. Helminths modulate immune responses of their hosts, and many observational and experimental studies support the hypothesis that helminths suppress immune-mediated chronic inflammation that occurs in asthma, allergy and IBD. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 24 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Spain | 3 | 13% |
United Kingdom | 2 | 8% |
Canada | 2 | 8% |
Australia | 2 | 8% |
Japan | 1 | 4% |
South Africa | 1 | 4% |
Germany | 1 | 4% |
Taiwan | 1 | 4% |
Belgium | 1 | 4% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Unknown | 10 | 42% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 13 | 54% |
Scientists | 6 | 25% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 5 | 21% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 355 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 2 | <1% |
United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
Chile | 1 | <1% |
Australia | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 350 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 49 | 14% |
Student > Bachelor | 39 | 11% |
Researcher | 32 | 9% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 27 | 8% |
Other | 22 | 6% |
Other | 71 | 20% |
Unknown | 115 | 32% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 112 | 32% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 28 | 8% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 24 | 7% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 17 | 5% |
Immunology and Microbiology | 10 | 3% |
Other | 42 | 12% |
Unknown | 122 | 34% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 26. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 April 2024.
All research outputs
#1,485,570
of 25,657,205 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3,165
of 13,151 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#16,460
of 322,528 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#67
of 253 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,657,205 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,151 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 322,528 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 253 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.