You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Treatment of recurrent stress urinary incontinence after failed minimally invasive synthetic suburethral tape surgery in women
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd009407.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Evangelia Bakali, Brian S Buckley, Paul Hilton, Douglas G Tincello |
| Abstract |
Surgery is a common treatment modality for stress urinary incontinence (SUI), usually offered for women who fail conservative treatments. Suburethral tapes have superseded colposuspension because cure rates are comparable and recovery time reduced. However, some women will not be cured after suburethral tape surgery, and currently there is no consensus on how to manage these women. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 64 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 63 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 11 | 17% |
| Researcher | 8 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 9% |
| Other | 5 | 8% |
| Other | 14 | 22% |
| Unknown | 13 | 20% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 29 | 45% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 5 | 8% |
| Psychology | 4 | 6% |
| Social Sciences | 3 | 5% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 5 | 8% |
| Unknown | 16 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 February 2014.
All research outputs
#15,309,599
of 25,595,500 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#10,938
of 13,156 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#115,022
of 205,561 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#168
of 211 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,595,500 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,156 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.8. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 205,561 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 211 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.