↓ Skip to main content

Hypothermia for neuroprotection in children after cardiopulmonary arrest

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (75th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
7 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
f1000
1 research highlight platform

Citations

dimensions_citation
23 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
227 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Hypothermia for neuroprotection in children after cardiopulmonary arrest
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2013
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd009442.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Barnaby Scholefield, Heather Duncan, Paul Davies, Fang Gao Smith, Khalid Khan, Gavin D Perkins, Kevin Morris

Abstract

Cardiopulmonary arrest in paediatric patients often results in death or survival with severe brain injury. Therapeutic hypothermia, lowering of the core body temperature to 32°C to 34°C, may reduce injury to the brain in the period after the circulation has been restored. This therapy has been effective in neonates with hypoxic ischaemic encephalopathy and adults after witnessed ventricular fibrillation cardiopulmonary arrest. The effect of therapeutic hypothermia after cardiopulmonary arrest in paediatric patients is unknown.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 227 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Korea, Republic of 1 <1%
Unknown 224 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 32 14%
Researcher 24 11%
Student > Bachelor 23 10%
Other 19 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 18 8%
Other 51 22%
Unknown 60 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 91 40%
Nursing and Health Professions 25 11%
Psychology 12 5%
Social Sciences 8 4%
Neuroscience 5 2%
Other 11 5%
Unknown 75 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 September 2016.
All research outputs
#6,523,781
of 25,457,858 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#7,793
of 11,842 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#50,982
of 205,393 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#128
of 210 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,457,858 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,842 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 38.9. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 205,393 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 210 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.