You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Oral and intrauterine progestogens for atypical endometrial hyperplasia
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd009458.pub3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Li Luo, Bing Luo, Ying Zheng, Heng Zhang, Jing Li, Neil Sidell |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| France | 1 | 13% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 13% |
| Mexico | 1 | 13% |
| Pakistan | 1 | 13% |
| Unknown | 4 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 8 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 165 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 165 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 19 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 17 | 10% |
| Researcher | 15 | 9% |
| Other | 11 | 7% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 11 | 7% |
| Other | 30 | 18% |
| Unknown | 62 | 38% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 45 | 27% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 16 | 10% |
| Psychology | 6 | 4% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 5 | 3% |
| Computer Science | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 21 | 13% |
| Unknown | 69 | 42% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 November 2020.
All research outputs
#4,341,004
of 25,722,279 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#6,809
of 13,135 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#88,818
of 448,109 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#152
of 221 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,722,279 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,135 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 33.9. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 448,109 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 221 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.