You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Different types of intermittent pneumatic compression devices for preventing venous thromboembolism in patients after total hip replacement
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd009543.pub3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jin Min Zhao, Mao Lin He, Zeng Ming Xiao, Ting Song Li, Hao Wu, Hua Jiang |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 207 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 207 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 30 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 29 | 14% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 21 | 10% |
| Other | 20 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 15 | 7% |
| Other | 42 | 20% |
| Unknown | 50 | 24% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 88 | 43% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 15 | 7% |
| Sports and Recreations | 8 | 4% |
| Engineering | 8 | 4% |
| Social Sciences | 6 | 3% |
| Other | 20 | 10% |
| Unknown | 62 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 20. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 July 2021.
All research outputs
#1,843,866
of 25,457,858 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3,941
of 11,499 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#24,423
of 360,066 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#92
of 272 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,457,858 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,499 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 40.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 360,066 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 272 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.