You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Pars plana vitrectomy versus scleral buckling for repairing simple rhegmatogenous retinal detachments
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd009562.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Ljubo Znaor, Aleksej Medic, Susanne Binder, Ana Vucinovic, Josipa Marin Lovric, Livia Puljak |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 33% |
| United States | 1 | 33% |
| Unknown | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 67% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 210 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 210 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 21 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 21 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 20 | 10% |
| Researcher | 16 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 13 | 6% |
| Other | 26 | 12% |
| Unknown | 93 | 44% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 72 | 34% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 12 | 6% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 2% |
| Psychology | 4 | 2% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 3 | 1% |
| Other | 13 | 6% |
| Unknown | 102 | 49% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 July 2019.
All research outputs
#15,801,384
of 25,461,852 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#10,436
of 12,090 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#205,021
of 365,843 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#141
of 149 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,461,852 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,090 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 38.2. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 365,843 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 149 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.